Marketing interlibrary loan services in Australia
Interlibrary loan (ILL) lets patrons access books, journals and other resources held by another library. It can extend a local collection, support researchers and remove the need to travel between branches or states. Yet the service often remains hidden behind catalogue links, staff counters or outdated forms, especially when patrons do not know it exists or understand how to request material.
Effective marketing presents ILL as an everyday library benefit rather than a specialist process. It connects clear information with convenient pathways, local partnerships and visible proof that requests succeed. In Australia, where distances are substantial and library services vary between states and territories, that combination can turn occasional resource sharing into a well-used service.
Reframe interlibrary lending around patron value
Start with the outcome patrons want: access to a particular title, article, recording or collection that is not available locally. Avoid leading with technical terms such as “reciprocal borrowing” or “document delivery”. “Request an item from another library” communicates the action immediately, while examples can show the wider benefits of collection access.
Different audiences need different reasons to try the service. University students may want a scholarly text needed for an assignment, while regional readers may value access to specialist stock without travelling to a major city. Researchers, multilingual households, teachers, hobby groups and genealogy enthusiasts may also discover value through different examples. Marketing can present these uses without creating separate complicated processes.
Position the service around access, convenience and responsible stewardship. Sharing a collection makes scarce material available without requiring every branch to purchase duplicate copies. Promotional material can explain that ILL often involves a partner library, requested items may take time to arrive and some formats cannot be transferred because of digital licences. Honest expectations build confidence and reduce frustration.
Make the service easy to discover
Create a prominent service page with a plain-language heading, search field and short explanation. Include photographs of the request journey, opening times, turnaround times, delivery options, charges and contact details. Link to it from the catalogue, library app, newsletters, social channels and community notices so that a patron encountering the service in one place can immediately act.
National discovery tools matter in a geographically dispersed market. Libraries Australia helps people locate participating libraries, while Trove connects many Australian catalogues and reveals resources that may sit outside a patron’s usual branch. Local library campaigns should still prioritise Google searches, direct catalogue results and physical branch signage, since many residents begin by searching for “books near me” or a specific title rather than navigating a national platform.
Physical and digital wayfinding benefit from the same principles. A practical analogy comes from the casino layout review, which demonstrates how sightlines, zoning and visual hierarchy can guide people through unfamiliar spaces. Apply that thinking to library counters and websites: separate self-service requests from general enquiries, use consistent labels and place the next step where patrons expect it.
Simplify every stage of the request
A request should not require repeated visits, phone calls or confusing instructions. Offer an accessible online form that requests only the information needed to identify the item and fulfil the loan. Autocomplete titles where possible, explain which edition is acceptable and allow patrons to nominate a preferred branch, delivery method or pickup arrangement. Australian patrons accustomed to mobile-first services and email or SMS updates should receive timely notifications at each stage.
Make the process work differently across the country without confusing the core offer. A metropolitan service such as Melbourne City Library may be able to refer patrons to nearby collections, while a regional or remote service may rely on post, courier or digital delivery. Libraries in Canberra, Brisbane, Adelaide, Hobart, Perth and Darwin can adapt the same communication model to local networks and collection agreements. Digital items require particular care because licence restrictions may prevent them from being supplied through ILL.
Privacy and accessibility should be designed into the pathway rather than added later. Follow applicable state or territory privacy law, the Commonwealth Privacy Act 1988 where it applies, and the Copyright Act 1968 when discussing copying and lending limits. Online forms and service pages should meet Australian accessibility requirements, including the Disability Discrimination Act 1992 and relevant web accessibility standards. Clear labels, keyboard-compatible controls and alternative contact routes prevent exclusion.
Build campaigns through trusted local partners
Partner organisations can extend promotion beyond the library’s own channels. Work with universities, TAFEs, schools, historical societies, reading groups, cultural associations and community service providers to identify subjects where extra access would be useful. A researcher can demonstrate the request process during a workshop, while a teacher or community leader can share a themed reading guide linking local interest with resources held elsewhere.
Co-branded campaigns create recognition without making the library appear to offer everything directly. For example, a Brisbane book club might promote a “request the next unavailable title” feature with an explanation of the delivery process. In regional communities, local newspapers, radio, council newsletters and community noticeboards may reach more people than a social media post alone. In cities, transit advertising, podcasts and collaborations with independent bookshops can reach audiences who rarely visit a branch.
Build the campaign around one achievable action. “Ask us to find it” is simpler than “Explore the national collection”, while “Send us your next book request” suits a strong general reading campaign. Subject-specific promotions can attract specialist interest: local history for a regional audience, recent releases for younger patrons, or scholarly sources for researchers. Each campaign should link to one clear request page and explain what happens after submission.
Measure results and build momentum
Track more than page visits. Useful indicators include awareness among patrons, catalogue searches that produce an ILL option, completed requests, abandoned forms, average fulfilment time, delivery costs and repeat use. Record where requests originate so campaigns with universities, community groups or particular branches can be evaluated. Usage data also reveals demand for subjects or formats that may justify future collection development.
Add short feedback questions at pickup, return and digital delivery stages. Ask whether the patron understood the process, how long they waited and what they would like to access next. Compare responses across metropolitan, regional and remote locations rather than relying on a single average. Comments about confusing language, inaccessible forms or unclear arrival dates often identify practical changes more effectively than a general satisfaction score.
Promote the service through a small, measurable pilot before expanding it. Choose one patron need, one partner and one action, then publish the request pathway everywhere that partner already communicates. Review results after two weeks, refine the message and share the strongest example with other branches. Choose one collection theme, one community partner and one patron-facing action, then launch a two-week interlibrary loan awareness pilot and review its first results together.